Nation’s Outrage Explodes as the Secondary Effects of the Financial Meltdown Hit a Stressed Middle Class

The turmoil and suffering due to the recession still has a long way to run. We are just reaching the states revenue shortfalls. There are still those millions of bad mortgages that are cleverly hidden in the bank books. Many states have decided that the trouble will be placed on teachers, other public workers and unions. It is ridiculous to assign the burden of the state’s shortfalls to an already stressed middle class while those who caused the problem remain untouched. There is not even a veneer of justice in this approach.


Pass a law which places all of the financial burden on the middle class workers, allows state assets to be sold without competition, cancel essentially all collective bargaining rights for teachers or other state workers , and finally add a number of additional insults to the people who do the states work - and you have Wisconsin. You also have one heck of a state protest which has exploded into a nationwide movement. You can be brought up-to-date on the 4 week struggle here.

The Wisconsin protests that initially shocked so many because of their size were driven by the lack of justice and the obvious attempt at union busting. The newly elected Wisconsin senate and governor were blatant in their disrespect to those whom they were supposed to manage through a difficult year. It was insulting to watch the attempts of the new Wisconsin government to place the burdens for revenue shortfall to the teachers, firemen, and police, and other government workers rather than on the poorly managed national financial institutions where it belongs.

The protests continue to grow. A recent protest on  March 12 in Madison was estimated by the police at 85,00o to 100,000. This is more that the largest Tea Party event.

There is a call for a new party that would correct the current situation. Robert Reich would call it the “Peoples Party”. Another solution that has been brought up has the shortfalls being mitigated by fines on those institutions responsible for the meltdown. Michael Moore calls for stricter measures in that many of those who caused the recession are thieves and should be arrested.

Although so far the protests have been very peaceful, you can sense that the patience is getting thin. Recalls are being prepared for many of the state senators who voted for the bill. As a constantly lied to class there is no confidence in a federal government that cannot pass a basic budget and is living off a two week fiscal extension. The middle class needs to see proof that the cozy government /special interests relationships at both the state and federal level will be either radically changed or replaced by just and honest organizations.

Let’s hope that this assurance will be forthcoming and/or everything is settled at the ballot box in 2012.

Is Washington Serious About Financial Reform?

On December 31, 2010 we reviewed an article in BusinessWeek that discussed the progress on the financial reform bill (aka Dodd Frank) As you remember, the bill passed in July 2010 and was our country’s effort to bring our financial sector under control. The bill as passed had very little clout. Developing the actual standards was passed on to the government regulatory agencies such as the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ( CFTC). The report confirmed that in the face of the banks and lobbyists very little were happening. The bill was very weak leaving many loopholes still in place.


BusinessWeek seems to be one major media that is following up on this very serious issue. They have just released another update "Starving the Regulators". This article reports the astonishing fact that cost cutting is going to reduce the staffs of the regulatory agencies charged with finalizing the rules. Progress will be further slowed and actually stop in several critical areas. The governing elite create an 11 trillion problem, and then reduce the resources charged with preventing another. The situation is summarized in this quote from BusinessWeek.

The reform of financial regulations has slowed down because of the underfunding of the SEC and CFTC. The Dodd-Frank reform requires 243 new rules, 67 one-time studies, and 22 recurring studies. Yet in the face of these requirements, the CFTC is considering laying off staff. The SEC has had to delay establishing an office to oversee the credit-rating agencies. On the other hand, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has hired staff and is focused on making credit cards more consumer-friendly and eliminating 80 percent of the mortgage paperwork needed to purchase a home.

It should be noted that the one agency meeting its schedule is the new consumer protection agency whose establishment was bitterly fought by the financial sector.

The encouraging experience is that BusinessWeek is devoting resources to following this issue. In doing so they are performing a great service to the productive sections of the economy, who are their primary customers. Unlike the financial sector the rest of the economy would greatly benefit from a reformed financial system.

We must remember that the financial sector is different from the general business community. The primary products are basically funded and guaranteed by the government. It was meant to be a service to the productive business areas. Once they began to focus on their individual profits they have become a real liability for the rest of the economy. The current lobbying blitz against reform is aimed at protecting their own profits.

Tea Party, this is really important. Why isn’t the rest of the media active about this situation?

Our Moral Obligation and a Total National Restoration Plan

The bean counters correctly complain about the financial deficit we are creating while attempting to end the recession. But because they are bean counters they have only one solution—maniacal cost cutting. It is driven by their DNA. Bean counters never lead to growth and expansion.

Cost cutting of wasteful spending is a valuable activity but it should not be done as an isolated task. Cost cutting alone, without wise investment of the savings; will only further shrink the already starved economy. It belongs as an element of an integrated national program where savings can be immediately put back into the productive work of our economy. The problem is that after all the time, suffering, and damage to our nations global position our two party elected government has still not developed such a plan.

The American vision contends that free people can productively govern themselves for the common good. No despots needed. This was a unique basis for a nation when the US was formed and the vision has been kept intact in America for 230 years. Sadly it is now at risk. We must not let the vision end with us. Like the Founders we must pledge our sacred honor to passing an intact America on to future generations. To fail would be a terrible legacy to leave our children.

We will never succeed with the existing approach of one by one attempts at underpowered solutions-followed by years of the parties blaming each other for failure. The citizens need to see an integrated program that reverses the self inflicted damage that was done to our interconnected financial, manufacturing, job creation,and trading systems. We have the talent to do this if we can free the process from interference by self serving special interests and the political parties. It will be an honest national restoration plan that the citizens can evaluate and support.

This is a complex undertaking because of the special interest opposition it will generate. Many of those who led us into the disasters are still in power and have benefited from our difficulties. They will fight against openness on past mistakes and the continual transparency of the plan’s execution to citizens.

It can succeed, however, if the majority of Americans feel strongly enough about the moral obligation to actively and honestly participate.

We must first gain an elected government, business sector, and population that agrees strongly with the moral obligation and the need for an integrated plan as a basis for action. Lots of details to work out but a primary characteristic is that it is citizen, not government, run.

This sounds like a job for that non-party, the Tea Party.

The Tea Party - Forerunner of a New American Political Architecture?

A No-Party Election Structure

With public approval of Congress at 17% it is unreasonable to think the current two-party system is serving us well. It has brought us very limited choice in candidates or philosophy and created inefficient and inept legislative houses. Worst of all, it has created leaders who have loyalty to their party that exceeds that to the country. Adams, Jefferson, and Washington were all strongly against the establishment of political parties. Very few citizens think that the parties operate for the general good of the citizens.

The country should give serious consideration to moving from the two party system to an architecture that is much more open to all citizens and that provides more choice. Forgetting for the moment the political agenda of the Tea Party we can use it as useful glimpse of how a no-party system might perform.

The Tea Party is not a political party in the conventional sense. It is a loose relationship of independent local organizations consisting of citizens from all walks of life. The local citizens support individual candidates that fall closest to their choice. This gives a very distributed architecture that has shown impressive power in the mid-terms for supporting new candidates in the primaries and opening the process to more citizens. It is taking a strong toll on the centralized power of the GOP.

How would it be if the entire American political system were organized on this basis, as opposed to the existing two party system? On the surface, not all that different. The all-controlling two parties would be replaced by many more advocacy groups. These organizations, many of whom would be national, could be more flexible in policies and indivdual candidates. They would replace the existing campaign headquarters of the two parties. Each center would normally present a slate of candidates and policies to support during the campaign. The multiple advocation oraganizations would offer a much broader political spectrum than the current two party system. The balloting would be the same as now but only vote on the position and candidates, not an organizational affiliation.

In the mid-terms the Tea Party used the GOP primaries to sort out the candidates which were to run in the finals. This would not be availabele in the no-party system. A new primary system would have to be designed, perhaps using state primary centers.

The advocate groups, of course, would have to be licensed and subject to qualifying rules.

Just a starting discussion, but worth exploring. It would be much closer to what our founders had in mind.